tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8070355695530434450.post2579637715265078846..comments2024-03-14T04:16:20.472-07:00Comments on In Socrates' Wake: Dishing out the "compliment sandwich"Michael Cholbihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02012523929044363216noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8070355695530434450.post-17597184656954495102012-02-16T19:23:16.356-08:002012-02-16T19:23:16.356-08:00Michael wrote:
"I wonder about what psycholo...Michael wrote:<br /><br />"I wonder about what psychology says about presenting feedback in this form — whether it sinks in, how it's received, etc."<br /><br />I am not sure about the details regarding this particular sandwich recipe. However, a fun book by Clifford Nass entitled _The Man Who Lied to His Laptop_ covers some related research on feedback (praise and criticism). The chapter on this topic is worthwhile. I won't go into the details here, but he recommends giving lengthy, detailed praise after brief, targeted criticism. <br /><br />He says research indicates the typical praise, criticism, praise sandwich is a mistake. Different sandwich recipe from above, though. With respect to that recipe, his research seems to suggest that (2) should come before (3) before (1).Dannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8070355695530434450.post-69922708885813392892012-02-16T09:58:41.570-08:002012-02-16T09:58:41.570-08:00Good reminder about taking the papers seriously as...Good reminder about taking the papers seriously as "attempts to do philosophy." I've used this technique (got it from the local toastmaster's club). Can't say if it is better or worse, but I feel better about the comments I giveMark Smilliehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15321175513358376462noreply@blogger.com