![]() |
John Tagg, The Learning College Paradigm |
![]() |
Dee Fink, Creating Significant Learning Experiences |
![]() |
Maryellen Weimer, Learner-Centered Teaching |
![]() |
John Bean, Engaging Ideas |
![]() |
John Tagg, The Learning College Paradigm |
![]() |
Dee Fink, Creating Significant Learning Experiences |
![]() |
Maryellen Weimer, Learner-Centered Teaching |
![]() |
John Bean, Engaging Ideas |
|
|
Teaching Philosophy - Volume 37, Number 1 - 2014
|
Jennifer Benson
Teaching radical philosophy
is tricky business, especially for junior academics. We are offered lower
division introductory courses and service courses in applied philosophy,
perhaps as adjunct or single-year contract employment. Our instructional
objectives and teaching materials are often defined by others. We may only be
able to include one or two readings in radical philosophy. Meanwhile, many
students are defensive when our courses introduce criticism of the various
forms of injustice generated by the social status quo. Offer students a
single radical source in an otherwise conical reading list and one risks
having the source dismissed as a tangent, bizarre and non-philosophical. In
short, the readings are tokenized: instead of making the course more diverse
and honoring the diversity in philosophy, the radical content is dismissed as
strange and unimportant. Recognizing the material necessity of adjunct
teaching and short contract teaching, and the importance of philosophy that
aims at social justice, I offer best practices when one can only teach a few
sources in radical philosophy.
|
|
"students who use their mobile phones during class lectures tend to write down less information, recall less information, and perform worse on a multiple-choice test than those students who abstain from using their mobile phones during class.”