Teaching
Philosophy - Volume 35, Number 3 - 2012
Available at: http://bit.ly/NTSK3y
|
|
Brian J. Huschle
The primary purpose of this study is to identify
differences in attainment of learning outcomes for ethics courses delivered
using two distinct teaching approaches. The first approach uses a case based
method in the context of applied moral issues within medical practice. The
second approach surveys moral theories in the context of applied moral
issues. Significant differences are found in the attainment of learner
outcomes between the two groups. In particular, attainment of outcomes
related to moral decision-making is higher in those students who take the
course with a case based method. In contrast, attainment of outcomes related
to personal beliefs about applied moral issues is higher in those students
who take an introductory ethics course surveying moral theories in the
context of applied issues. Neither of these results is especially surprising.
What may be surprising, however, is that students in the case-based course do
not appear attain learner outcomes with regard to applied moral issues
despite studying those issues in detail. Finally, the assessment tool
developed and refined through this study may be of use for assessment in a
variety of ethics courses.
|
||
Crystal L'Hôte
I describe and articulate the merits of an
elegant supplemental exercise that I call “Philosophy in the Wild” (PW),
which has students initiating a philosophical dialogue outside the classroom
and critically reflecting on the results. The PW exercise is especially
effective if used to reinforce philosophic texts which have dialogue as their
form or as their subject matter (or both)—for instance, Plato’s Apology and
Meno. However, the PW exercise is also an engaging, effective way simply to
introduce students to the practice and the value of philosophy.
|
||
Jennifer McCrickerd
This paper is a critical examination of Daryl
Close’s “Fair Grades” (2009). I dispute his view regarding the implications
of accepting the purpose of grades as being fundamentally informational. I
draw upon data identifying behaviors conducive to success and Carol Dweck’s
work to argue for broadening what can be taken into account for a final
grade. I argue that the informational purpose of final grades is preserved if
we grade with an eye to encouraging general skills and dispositions conducive
to success. Also, grading as Close recommends will discourage learning
whereas using grades to reinforce positive behaviors is a fulfillment of our
responsibility to enhance learning. I also address Close’s claims that curved
grading and grade penalties for academic dishonesty are unfair and argue that
neither of these practices necessarily corrupts final grades.
|
||
Daniel P. Malloy
Popular culture is ubiquitous. And referencing
popular culture can be an excellent pedagogical tool. Used properly, it
provides students with easily accessible examples—in some cases examples they
have already been interested in. Given these facts, the creation and
expansion of the literature on the intersection of popular culture and
philosophy is not surprising. The purpose of these volumes has been
controversial since their inception, but they do seem ideally suited as
introductory texts. This essay examines four recent volumes in popular
culture and philosophy as pedagogical tools. These volumes on Sherlock
Holmes, Christmas, Dr. Seuss, and Facebook all offer unique and useful tools
for the teacher attempting to introduce students to philosophy.
REVIEWS
|
||
Timothy Chambers
|
||
David W. Drebushenko
|
||
Michael Goldman
|
||
Robert Gould
|
||
D. Micah Hester
|
||
Jeremiah Joven Joaquin
|
||
Jeffery Johnson
|
||
Sally Markowitz
|
||
Jennifer L. Woodrow
|
||
Mark Young
|
||
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you wish to use your name and don't have a blogger profile, please mark Name/URL in the list below. You can of course opt for Anonymous, but please keep in mind that multiple anonymous comments on a post are difficult to follow. Thanks!