Forrest Perry
This paper describes a
project I have my students do that is based on parallels between the position
Socrates describes himself as being in when addressing the charge that he
corrupts the youth of Athens and the position critics of capitalism in the
U.S. are in when they try to make the case that capitalism is a deeply flawed
system that needs to be transformed into something better. For the project,
students are asked to give to three audiences of their own choosing a
presentation in which they argue against capitalism. The main aim of the
project is to help students to appreciate that although the unexamined life
may not be worth living, living an examined life can be difficult to do since
it can feel a little like dying.
|
Christopher A. Pynes
Overwhelmingly, students
desire the opportunity to earn extra credit because they want higher grades,
and many professors offer extra credit because they want to motivate
students. In this paper, I define the purposes of both grading and extra
credit and offer three traditional arguments for making extra credit
assignments available. I follow with seven arguments against the use of extra
credit that include unnecessary extra work, grade inflation, and ultimately
paradox. I finish with an example of a case where extra credit could be justified,
although it relies on an important equivocation. Ultimately, I show that
extra credit is neither a pedagogically sound nor a conceptually coherent
grading practice, and I conclude that extra credit should not be part of the
pedagogical toolbox.
Sinclair A. MacRae
The Cooperation Game
In this paper I explain how to play and administer a game that helps teach students a lesson about the value of cooperation and the role of ethics and the law in obtaining the conditions under which cooperation is reasonable. I also discuss several applications of this Cooperation Game, primarily in courses in social and political philosophy, introductory ethics, and the philosophy of law. The game can usefully be played with a range of groups of students from small tutorial sections to large sections over one hundred, and the game and post-game analysis can be completed in one or two classes.
|
Elizabeth Schiltz
This article articulates a
range of possible pedagogical goals for courses in comparative philosophy,
and discusses a number of methods and strategies for teaching courses
intended to achieve those ends. Ultimately, it argues that the assignment to
teach comparative philosophy represents an opportunity to design a course
with remarkable freedom and tremendous potential. Comparative philosophy
courses can engage students in unique ways that not only increase their
understanding of the fundamental assumptions and beliefs of non-Western
traditions, but also facilitate the development of the skills and
dispositions that enable them to become better philosophers.
|
Tuesday, April 8, 2014
New articles in Teaching Philosophy
New articles, from v. 37, no. 2, of Teaching Philosophy are now online. Abstracts below:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Seven arguments against extra credit is my favourite article from this list. I read it with pleasure and I really appreciate the technique you use in its tile - indeed, shaking the common beliefs is a job for a skillful article writer, as you are.
ReplyDelete